[公告] 痞客豐年終!萬元禮券限量送~[公告] 第一屆痞客邦金點賞登場!2014年最有影響力的部落格即將揭曉[公告] 痞客邦新服務上線 每日星座運勢測算【得獎名單公佈】[公告] 痞客邦應用市集全新改版![公告] 痞客邦「應用市集」新 App 上架-iFontCloud Professional

新世界地圖與地球自轉的情形

Fred根據資料利用Google來研究將極移後地球的自轉情形

藉此瞭解適合居住的地區在哪裡。

同時發現海水因為兩極徹底融化

而不可避免地會上漲180公尺左右。

請格友自行參考以下影片:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi0Gt-Zel5Q

結論:

台灣將會度過極移與海嘯的災難!

台灣也不會因為海水上漲而沒頂!

台灣會很冷,適合避難但不適合長期居住!

Posted by FrederickWang at 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(186) 引用(0) 人氣()


open trackbacks list Trackbacks (0)

留言列表 (186)

Post Comment
  • 台南夥伴
  • 謝謝Fred辛苦的幫忙翻譯解說!!
    這幾天利用自己的表達方式..
    開始分享這些訊息給週遭了。
    感恩!


  • 訪客
  • 那我们下一步要討論遷居的問題嗎?
  • 沒有政治意圖
  • 移極之後

    台灣會跟大陸相連嗎?

    我不想過台灣海峽的黑水溝~~這時候覺得先祖很偉大....
  • asabuchi
  • 我打算到鄉下買個小房子(不用多少錢) 開始撤離城市的生活了....
    人類得恢復自然的野外生活習性/能力 否則被文明豢養已久 一到野外
    大概都差不多死路一條吧.....
  • 訪客
  • 六個原子爐,北四南二,是否能渡過海嘯?
    原子爐好像無法快速停機,日本資料說要二年才能降溫到100°C以下,三到五年才能移動用過的核燃料棒到另一地點。
  • 訪客
  • 以google極移後的圖型來看整個亞洲地區都變成南極...不會是要消滅黃種人吧!我們這麼善良又與自然共存說...大家準備冬季的保暖衣物還有黃金船票,要移民了!
  • 訪客
  • hello~~thanks for your info , really helps!! 不過稍微提一個口誤的部份 免造成其它人誤會喔~~ 愈靠近南北極 叫做高緯度 愈靠近赤道 才是低緯度喔~~
  • 咦?
    南極圈和北極圈是高緯度沒錯,
    難道Fred說錯了嗎?
    抱歉!

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/04/28 20:39

  • Carol
  • ???
    為什麼我轉的變成台灣在赤道附近?
  • 訪客
  • Carol 有看到台灣及亞洲在地球上嗎 ? 赤道貫穿歐洲,非洲,阿拉斯加,太平洋及現在的南北極不是嗎? 原來動物園的國王企鵝才是有遠見的,台灣將成為南極小島...呵呵!
  • Carol
  • 噢~這下看到了,我轉的角度不一樣
    感恩啊~
  • silvia
  • 非常謝謝Fred的辛苦,給我們更明確的新世界地圖.
    邊看邊拿著地球儀開始轉,
    然後又拿了尺在地球儀上量印度((新南極)到台灣的距離,
    再等距離放在現在的地球儀上,
    發現約略是在緯度50的地方
    目前南緯50度經過南美阿根廷的福克蘭群島,智利的威靈頓城
    北緯50度經過蒙古,哈薩克,烏克蘭,捷克,德國慕尼黑,盧森堡
    法國巴黎,加拿大溫哥華
    如此是否可以想像極移後的台灣也能如以上各地區的環境
    不知這樣推論有沒有錯
  • Fred得到的結論是:
    台灣會比現在紐西蘭更偏新南極一些
    表示無法一年三獲,
    一大堆葉菜類都無法種植,
    氣候將會和現在的西伯利亞和大陸東北最北邊差不多。

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/04/28 20:30

  • 訪客
  • 四面有海,大概和倫敦、巴黎、溫哥華、西雅圖、庫頁島比較接近。

    還得看洋流,如果有溫暖洋流就溫暖,沒有溫暖洋流就寒冷。
    像日本本州面對亞洲大陸的那一側就超冷會一直下雪,面對太平洋的那一側就溫暖。
  • 想到暖流就想太遠了,
    反正黃曆從此無用
    (就算是處於原來中國一樣的經緯度上,
    由於山勢海流等,氣候特徵一定跟之前不一樣!!)
    所以Fred才會在課程當中再三強調:
    要具備創業家們事實求是,
    依照當時環境與狀況做出反應,
    以及求新求變的精神才能為功。

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/04/28 20:27

  • 我不想去南極
  • 昨天我才做好準備 心理建設未來可能要吃蒼蠅昆蟲維生
    現在跑到南極~~

    我還不想喝麋鹿血耶

    現在要好好研究愛斯基摩人的生活方式~~
    從國中開始
    我就很好奇小愛人是靠什麼補充纖維值?
  • to 13樓
  • 不一定所有的人都要纖維質才能身體不出問題

    我去過南非 那邊的人幾乎都只吃肉= =

    而且老師並沒有說台灣變成南極 只是比較靠近而已 網友也推出來了之後的緯度也許等同現在的倫敦
  • to 13樓
  • 不一定所有的人都要纖維質才能身體不出問題

    我去過南非 那邊的人幾乎都只吃肉= =

    而且老師並沒有說台灣變成南極 只是比較靠近而已 網友也推出來了之後的緯度也許等同現在的倫敦
  • 訪客
  • 愛斯基摩人的骨質疏鬆症很普遍
    沒有新鮮疏菜  沒辦法
    那麼冷  能活就很不得了



    他們的語文有三十幾種不同的白色  因為在冰天雪地中要走對路必需要能分辨三十多種不同層次的白色


    他們若有兩人以上傷病  原則上先救輕傷  後救重慯  順序與急診室相反   與戰地火線一致   
    若兩人傷勢一樣則先救年輕力壯者  因為可以增加整體存活率
    生活環境就等同戰地
  • 我也選好中部山區了
  • 我山洞也選好在中部山區了耶

    我選擇某處的國家公園了

    兩年前去過,山高近一千公尺~~這個高度不會缺氧

    生態保護得宜,蒼天古木依然矗立,又有一大片平地,減少被亂石砸中的風險

    重點是有靈氣,我相信此地可以逢兇化吉

    明年下半年會灑鈔票包場

    就歲什麼事都沒 long stay也不錯~~
  • silvia
  • 真的是山洞嗎?
    如果被國家公園管理局的人看到了,
    不會被趕走?
    儲備物資怎麼處理?
  • asabuchi
  • 有辦法在那麼高的地方放置貨櫃屋嗎?
    看最近有人在埔里置放貨櫃屋有感...
  • 當然一開始不能住在山洞
  • 首先 赴錢進去國家公園

    現在都有long stay的行程,我會付錢說要來long stay

    然後看你要自己搭帳篷還是住管理處的宿舍

    一開始當然要像正常人

    揉後勘查地形 山洞有看到幾個 但除非帳篷不能住 否則我不太願意當山頂洞人

    物資的確比較麻煩

    但包場long stay 你的確有權帶一些物資上山

    山上有山泉,附近有農民及森林,加上自己儲備的一些物資

    天啊 ,這是世外桃源吧~
  • go7color
  • 上過第一梯的不可說的祕密,聽小奶奶說磁移後,我就在想如果台灣變成冰天雪地,要如何用水? 目前我們生活的環境好像都不是為這樣的氣候所設計的。
  • 我覺得可以參考北歐耶
  • 若以新台灣的緯度,加上被推高的地形
    其實有些類似現今的北歐

    也是地勢高 接近極圈

    很值得我們參考借鏡



  • 我想要一篇資訊
  • 昨天 我搜尋 未來人查理
    有一篇 查理指導劫後餘生者可以準備的物品
    包含可準備鹽 玉米糊 以及其他的求生守則

    我個人是覺得很有參考價值

    但我今天怎麼搜尋 就找不到這一篇 求生指導的文章

    即使我回到歷程記錄搜尋 也看不到了

    我不想往陰謀論想

    在這邊想請教網友 如果你們有搜尋到 或 有保存下來

    請麻煩分享告知 謝謝
  • 訪客
  • 個人比較喜歡小奶奶...
    他給人一種很祥和的感覺,
    他所說都是在安撫人心,
    他微笑著告訴我們別害怕一切都會過去,
    也有美好的未來在等我們...
    看完小奶奶的影片總是可以安撫自己的心。
  • 訪客
  • 經球面幾何的試算,極移後台灣與新南北極的距離約當現在北緯61°29’,約當斯德哥爾摩、赫爾辛基、奧斯陸、聖彼德堡、阿拉斯加。
    比丹麥還靠近極地,已經和北極圈﹙連續數月永晝永夜﹚相距不遠。

    要學習北歐維京人的求生方式。

    計算過程﹙敬請指正﹚:
    台灣嘉義(N 23°20’)與印度加爾各達都位於北回歸線附近,經度﹙小圓航線﹚相差32°09’
    折合1929海浬 X cos(23°20’) = 1771海浬 = 「大圓航線」的29°31’。
  • asabuchi
  • 格友們如果有佛教徒, 也看過以前天華出版社出的"禪定天眼通的實踐"(
    馮馮著作), 應該有印象馮馮居士曾說過在一次禪定中, 被觀世音菩薩帶領
    暢遊宇宙(神識離體),感知宇宙各界的生命,
    也看到地球從古到今, 不知有多少次文明被摧毀(磁移等災難), 只是太多證據
    都埋在深深的岩層或海底, 我們的地質學家不知道而已.....

    這次要來看是否親身體驗了....

    不過所有宗教都告訴我們, we are immortal--把日子當個 online game, 盡興的玩,
    準備, 生活, 活在當下吧---玩 game時知道前面有怪獸/關卡, 不是讓人更
    excited?? 有誰玩 game時會希望時什麼都沒發生, 直接到終點的?? 如果真會
    遇到, 我相信是地球上所有勇敢的靈魂決定要一起來玩的一場game. Take it
    easy!

    別像奧修所說的: "很多人活著時認為自已永遠不會死(所以都花時間作一些瑣碎不
    重要的事), 但等死後卻又讓人覺得此人似乎從未活過(不曾真正去活出生命來)"

    共勉之!
  • 訪客
  • 極移後看起來台灣會接近在高緯度的南極圈,到時還要看地球的頃斜度才能確定北回歸線及南回歸線(太陽直射最高緯度),如果兩線太接近極圈會擴大,到時台灣連陽光都看不到...真要移民了.
  • 訪客
  • 地球頃斜越大,海平面越高,陸地越少,相對海浪的沖擊也比較大,頃斜越小冰封地區越大,就沒有四季了,極地永遠是冬天,赤道附近永遠是夏天,氣侯及洋流又是別的影響因素,反正不管怎麼變我們只能掌握自己的心態及能力所及.

  • 訪客
  • 上帝創造天地創造人的時候,命令人吃素。
    「我﹙上帝﹚供給五穀和各種果子作你們﹙人﹚的食物。 但是所有的動物和鳥類,我給牠們青草和蔬菜吃。」


    諾亞方舟﹙大洪水﹚之後,上帝允許人開始吃肉。
    「我﹙上帝﹚絕不再像這一次把地上所有的生物都毀滅了。 只要大地存留一天,地上一定有播種,有收穫;有寒暑、冬夏,和日夜。」
    「從前我﹙上帝﹚把蔬菜給你們﹙人﹚作食物,現在我﹙上帝﹚也把這些動物給你們﹙人﹚作食物。」



    可能是超大洪水之後地軸傾斜角度加大,造成冬夏溫差加大,冬天冰天雪地不得不吃肉。
  • 雅惠妹
  • 希望未來地震不會影響台灣唷!!!
  • nervlee
  • 到時信義區與大安區1坪商業用地可能會只剩 100元有找
  • 真抱歉!
    除非海底的不動產也有人要買。

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/04/29 10:26

  • 訪客
  • 剛剛在看一次新地圖

    其實
    台灣相鄰的亞洲大陸不遠

    等地球穩定下來
    就可以慢慢攜家帶眷
    往北方遷徙 尋找更合適的地方

    中國還要在經過一些內耗 才能穩定

    這樣的人生真有趣
    前半輩子是北半球人
    後半輩子是南半球人
    除了我們這一代
    可以恭逢其盛,哈

    誰還要花錢買土地
    地球剩下十分之一的人口
    只要你有本事生存
    種植 捕魚 放牧 就可以定居下來
    因為有本事的人可以照顧更弱勢的人
  • Fred正在傷腦筋:
    到時候要如何從「台灣過唐山」?
    (剛好與祖先相反,哈!)

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/04/29 20:02

  • 訪客
  • 工程人的本職:自己動手作。
    計算尺、日晷、六分儀、氣泡式水平儀﹙自備吸管﹚、水車、發電機﹙需要自備永久磁鐵、導電線﹚、齒輪、滑輪、水鐘、用筷子架拱型無橋墩的竹木橋﹙縮小模型﹚、獨木舟、筏、卡榫嵌合﹙無鐵釘﹚的柱樑、水閘門、觀測天象來自製日曆、…
  • 訪客
  • 台中航空站還能撐到40m。﹙不考慮水電供應和專業地勤人員出勤率﹚
    高雄空港和桃園空港到13m就變海港了。
  • 訪客
  • 假設海平面上升60公尺,高雄港、台北盆地﹙300年前叫台北湖﹚、長江口三角州、洞庭湖到漢水入長江的匯流口週邊﹙3000年前叫雲夢大澤﹚、華北海河三角州、日本關東平原、關西近畿平原、巴黎、倫敦…整片都變水族館。


  • Fred的資料顯示:是180公尺喔!

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/04/29 20:01

  • 訪客
  • 天文曆上2012年開始於2011年12月22日(冬至),"太陽照到南迴歸線那一刻"起.


    2011-12-22冬至(近日點)
    2012-03-21春分
    2012-06-22夏至(橢圓軌道的遠日點)
    2012-09-23秋分
    是四個節點


    可能2011-12-22後就開始... ...
  • 台北天文館
  • 今天到台北天文館 學一些天文知識

    除了認真的比較四季星座的不同
    也注意南北半球不同的星體

    推薦給北部想觀側星象的朋友
  • silvia
  • 以下聯結有提到Fred上課時說的地下碉堡
    及Nibiru(X行星)的訊息
    http://www.wretch.cc/blog/ss70691/33724047
  • 看了這些影片的正反說法之後
    (稍微聳動了一些)
    找到一個「非常詭異,但不得不令人信服」的證據。
    等大家看完後,
    Fred再將翻譯好的證據po上來。
    真的太誇張了…
    真是讓人不能不提防啊~

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/04/30 09:00

  • 路過的鄉民
  • to 43樓:請問你po的連結中所說的地下碉堡跟下面的連結好像是同一個耶
    http://www.reconnectiontaiwan.tw/viewthread.php?tid=161&extra=page%3D1
    我在看完上面連結的文章後再比對影片裡的場景後....這個地下碉堡是外星人拿來對人類做實驗的場所,能住進去的人類我想只有那些特殊的人才能進去吧。
  • andy
  • 還記得瑪雅人的水晶骷髏傳說吧 在國家地理頻道的科學實驗證實水晶骷髏並非是瑪雅那個年代所製 而這傳說在之前已被信了將近一百多年了 關於種種的2012預言還要信嗎????
  • 大愛之路
  • 如果真的肯定會發生 極移

    那我的目標 用金銀 換取穩定的現金流 不就成了幻想+妄想了+ 不用再去想了

    哀.....(泣)

    瞬間覺得 放眼未來這點~應該改成 即時享樂了
  • 你一定沒有上「不可說的秘密」課程。

    而且就是因為當年銀行家與國王們太聰明
    拼命詐取「穩定的現金流」
    而導致現在世界的滅亡
    (污染,資源不均,不公平,缺乏公義,一切向錢看,等等)
    真是共業啊!

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/04/30 08:57

  • 在台灣很幸運了
  • 說句老實話
    在台灣只要儲備糧食 往高地跑
    就有很高的存活率

    全世界好像很難找找到這樣的地方
    鄰近的島國 沒有一個像我們這樣幸運的
    ~~ 只要你願意 ,你就可以活下來
    其他地方的人哪來這樣的選擇權?

    大災難是不可避免了
    轉機因工程已經到了最邪惡的地步
    種子下土 反而使大地之母萬年無法孕育生物
    人類怎麼可以自私到這個地步?

    我想到在新世界
    可以免於轉機因食物的威脅,就覺得太值得了
    吃昆蟲都還不必擔心禍延子孫

    想吃想玩快點去
    記得準備活下來就好~~
  • silvia
  • T0:FRED
    非常謝謝你,願意撥出時間為我們翻譯,不然只能邊看邊猜
    我想這也是一種~愛~的表現,
    所有願意為他人付出及分享的朋友
    都是心中有愛之人
    願我們都能一起迎接美好新世界
  • 訪客
  • 電影<水世界>
  • 訪客
  • 谷狗資料顯示 假設海面上升180m, 美國淹水區為 :密希西比河三角洲全部 五大湖區全部 新英格蘭東半
    其他地區好像都還在海平面上 特別是中西部大穀倉都還在海平面上

    阿拉斯加有石油

    再考慮 新自轉軸 美國為於新北迴歸線附近 等於緯度降低 可以多收成一次



    其他大穀倉 :
    俄羅斯 烏克蘭淹沒
    巴西阿根廷變北極 學作愛斯基摩人
    泰國越南的河口三角洲淹沒
    長江三角洲 淹沒, 黃淮平原 淹沒
    兩湖流域(洞庭湖-漢水-荊州-三峽-武漢-岳陽-九江..一帶) 淹沒, 回復成三千年前雲夢大澤的樣子. (西周第四任國王南征到雲夢大澤 看到"水天一色" 表示一望無際)



    這表示假設還要維持全球幾十億人口  那全球都要靠美國的糧食


    依照自給自足(不進口糧食)所能支撐的人口計算 
    漁獵: 刀耕火種 : 精耕 : 石化燃料的工業式農耕
    = 1 : 10 : 100 : 200


    所以漢人帶來精耕 養活十倍百倍的漢人 用人海戰術就蠶食掉原住民的漁獵刀耕火種的地盤



    趕快拜老一輩原住民為師  學野外求生
  • 給樓上
  • 去找獵人學校

    原住民有開課~~
  • 阿福
  • 使用Google earth 地平面檢視功能下方提供海拔高度不知準不準,應可拿來參考找尋安全之地
  • 訪客
  • 地震了
  • 訪客
  • 假設新北極在巴西聖保羅和里約熱內盧之間 W45, S23.5
    則"對心點"新南極在日本那霸島和硫璜島之間 E135, N23.5 離台灣只有12度 (永晝永夜).


    要學茹毛飲雪 用冰塊蓋房子  打海豹  打北極熊  打企鵝



    現存冰封的長毛象的胃裡  還有尚未消化的青草  原來是上次極移造成超急速冷凍保鮮



    南級洲的冰層裡有千年古木  原來是上次極移由熱帶雨林直接急速冷凍大搬家



    南緯十二度  就和現在的南極洲差不多了


    水面結冰  能去哪兒

    學習打獵
  • Fred認為在塵埃落定後,
    許多植物會有無法生長的問題,
    許多動物會有無法生存的問題,
    假使台灣移到預言的位置,
    台灣方圓幾千里內
    也不會有海豹,北極熊與企鵝出現。
    浩劫後許多物種都瀕臨絕滅,
    打獵真的不是長久之計(也不實際)。

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/04/30 20:07

  • 訪客
  • 緯度四十五度以下 才有可能在不用化石燃料的天然條件下農耕  看長城的位置就知道

    更高緯度只有打獵  騎馬打仗(匈奴)  作海盜(維京人)

    要放牧還得看有沒有草   羊吃草是連根拔起  破壞水土 很快就變砂漠
    南緯十二度  比匈奴人蒙古人滿州人 北海道愛奴人 都還高緯度  沒有足夠的草  又沒辦法騎馬去別處拿(四週都是海)  
  • 訪客
  • 南緯88度
  • 訪客
  • 急速冷凍快遞到南極 南緯七十八度(差12度)  只有我們這一代人才能碰上    難得
    大開眼界

  • 坐咖啡杯
  • 坐咖啡杯
    從北緯23.5送到南極圈
    ~~~~太過癮了
    各位,要抓穩喔!!

    可是,我真的對企鵝肉沒興趣~~
  • 這應該叫做「地球杯」
    或者「台灣杯」吧?

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/05/01 00:52

  • 訪客
  • 我想知道 一件事情的優先順序
    到底是極移先來還是N.W.O 呢
    希望大家能回應
  • Fred不知道,也不太關心
    無論誰先誰後,
    結論都是:人們當自強!

    Fred猜測就在發生天災之前,
    各國宣布進入戒嚴(NWO的初步形式)
    嚴格控制民生物資(除了食物油鹽外,還包括電力與通訊)
    在天災過後利用當初有錢人和政府所造的方舟內
    完善的營養,武器,能源的優勢
    想辦法「完全統一」控制全球(NWO佈局完成)
    這樣一來原有國王們仍然可以坐享其成
    全球百姓只為了一口飯吃只好聽命任其宰割奴役
    (所以要植入晶片予以管理)
    Fred所得到的消息是:
    絕不能貪圖原有生活形式而去支援NWO
    絕不植入晶片,遠離城市人群,
    低調形成自立自足的小社區,
    熬過「反上帝造物者和複製人的戰爭」
    以及「流行大瘟疫」之後,
    就能迎接人類文明最高峰的寶瓶世紀。

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/04/30 21:30

  • 瞎緊張
  • 新的南極冰層又還沒形成
    所以我們可能無法領略到永晝永夜的極地生活
    就已經到北方去播種了
  • 訪客
  • 了解感謝Fred 的解說
    這樣就通了


  • Nathan
  • 我一直想到尼可拉斯凱吉所演的 先知(神秘代碼)這部片

    電影的結尾真的與我們所準備的事情有些雷同
  • 這部電影翻成「末日預言」
    這正是除了「極移」之外,
    另外一個主流天災預言
    也就是所謂的「超級太陽風暴」。

    Fred覺得無論是哪一種發生,
    準備工作上會有八成雷同。

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/05/01 00:51

  • 高雄的Ajay
  • 我想還是來個平衡報導
    這是在王中和blog裡的一篇NASA對於Nibiru的回應(官方說法?)
    http://regulusab.pixnet.net/blog/post/28413994
    裡面有指出 如果Nibiru真實存在
    那以現在的時間點 早就可以肉眼看出
    不曉得各位當中有無天文愛好者有相關資訊?!

    我有一位愛觀看天文的同事
    跟他稍微說了Nibiru的問題
    他很驚訝!!驚訝是因為他根本不知道這件事
    他像我們一般人一樣馬上拜google大神
    看了文章 回了一句:科學家證實Nibiru是偽造的...
    我想請他看看能不能用現有的器材去觀看
    但不曉得現在該往哪個方向 哪個時間點去看
    (大家都說在太陽旁 但不可能每個季節都在太陽旁吧?!)
    想說自己來搜尋一下 看Nibiru現在應該在什麼位置
    發現其實自己完全看不懂 哈!!
    煩請各位格友指點!!
  • 感謝po平衡報導,
    Fred也看了許多「反面」資料,
    都沒有這個整理的清楚。

    不過綜覽反駁證據時發現都有一個共通點:
    「如果真的存在,NASA早就公開了」
    「如果真的發生了,一定會有數千人發表證據」

    Fred認為其中第七點最可疑,因為:
    1. Google製造天空時,應該有除錯程式或檢查機制,
    怎麼會有圖黑或遺漏的一塊呢?
    (Fred讓星空隨意緩轉了10幾分鐘,沒有發現第二塊沒有星空的區域
    Fred認為這是目前最確鑿的證據之一,請各位自行搜索Google Map星空)

    2. 又好巧這塊被挖掉的地方
    與宣稱在南極洲所拍到Nibiru是同一個位置呢?

    3.「沒人發表???」
    就是有一大堆瘋子在網路上發表與流傳啊?!
    唯獨政府相關機構都保持沈默。

    君不見從60年前直到今日,
    都有許多瘋人在說:「羅茲威爾事件就是外星人與美國人接觸」
    也一直被官方駁斥嗎?
    如果哪天政府宣布「確有其事」,
    那時候Nibiru又怎麼辦?
    假若事情真的發生了,
    你認為政府會出面「負起責任」嗎?

    看了雙方(這只是一位「未署名」科學家的看法
    而且我們都領教過所謂的「正統科學家」
    長久認為中醫是迷信,嗤之以鼻的態度吧?
    大家自行判斷吧!

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/05/01 09:32

  • nibiru
  • 肉眼就看得到了

    觀察個一星期的白日天空 你一定有發現

    時間選擇早上9-10點 下午傍晚
    避開太陽光強烈的中午
    因為 有時nibiru真的靠太陽很近

    就在太陽旁邊 有時候會離得稍遠一些 但應該都與太陽同一面
    圓圓 但不亮
    會以為是月亮

    看到時 就立刻廣播 證實太陽旁邊那顆球到底是什麼 ?
    按照nasa的預測
    原本該在冥王星後面的nibiru 現在已經進入黃道
    它的體積跟木星有得拼~~胖娃娃

    天文望遠鏡看到的 應該是胖娃娃的nibiru
    因為月亮真的很小一個
  • 訪客
  • 我現在要隨身帶相機

    拍到兩顆太陽
    在上傳給大家~~
  • 別怕南極圈
  • 印度會是新南極
    但極移之後,它也不會那麼快結冰

    氣候可能沒有像現在的南極那樣惡劣

    而且之前的南極被搬到赤道 冰層也還沒完全融化

    一個還沒結冰 一個還沒融化
    地球在極移後的一兩年 氣候還在調節中

    所以 我們可能無法以現有的經驗去想像極移後的一兩年生活

    但是 我們可以趁著還沒完全大雪紛飛
    往北慢慢遷移

    大概被留下來的就是中華民族 北歐民族 紐西蘭 為大宗
    比起傲慢的其他人種
    我們這群算是敬天愛物了

    台灣被搬到極圈 就交給老天爺管了

    我們往北走 去照顧其他被蹂躪過的土地
    繼續發揚敬天愛物的心性~~
  • 而且如果發生時間如預言所說的
    是在明年12月21日冬至左右
    (雖然Fred最近得到情報可能提前
    這要看大家是否即日起從「心」出發,
    或許可以延後,甚至降低台灣的災情)
    那時候南半球是盛夏,
    不至於立即變成寒冬。

    另外一種新極地版本,
    就是印度仍然是南極(看樣子他們在劫難逃)
    但是變成夏威夷是新北極,
    在這種情況下台灣在南迴歸線附近
    反而更不用擔心寒冷所造成的問題。

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/05/01 17:29

  • silver-knights(還活在被電視控制下的生活嗎?)
  • 如果我是歐吧螞!一定馬上公布所有真相,
    如:珍珠港,911,sars,haarp,太空計劃51區,共濟會,FED金融貨幣制度,2008經融海嘯,H5n1,愛滋病,饑荒,食品壟斷,轉基因食物,手機,癌症,不孕(阿斯巴甜(代糖)),水中氟化物,地球暖化,氣象衛星,煙酒槍枝毒品壟斷,聯邦xx安全法,face book,apple,代理人戰爭,各國政要貪污醜聞,.........等等,族繁不及備載!
    當然也會開心而誠實的告訴你,生活中確實有外星人的存在,然而我們一直有獻祭牛羊和人類給他們,以獲得良好和諧互動,也會詳細說明地球即將面對到太陽黑子,地震火山海嘯,nibiru星,磁移.....等地球物理現象.但放心,我們已經從1960年代開始建置多個專為特定身份的人所準備的地下基地,所以,請羊群們多多看電視,不要想太多,繼續努力工作到最後一天,但不要忘了,這個月的帳單還是要繳ㄛ!
  • bato
  • Nibiru行星造成地球極移的理論有缺陷,即Nibiru果若每3600來一次,則應可從中國史料上尋找前兩次有關天災地變的敘述或傳說。

    前一次當在西元前1600年左右,時當夏末商初時期;當時是有遭遇到氣候變化,大概在西元前2000-1500年間,中國北方氣候變乾變冷,年均氣溫下降3度以上,農牧交替帶南移近1個緯度,迫使居住太行山東麓、習於農作(特別是粟)之商人南遷,接觸夏文化,並覆滅夏朝。

    再前一次當在西元前5200年前後,重大的地變可能是西漢《淮南子》所說的「昔者共工與顓頊爭為帝,怒而觸不周之山,天柱折,地維絕。天傾西北,故日月星辰移焉;地不滿東南,故水潦塵埃歸焉。」這裡講「天傾西北,故日月星辰移焉;地不滿東南,故水潦塵埃歸焉」,可指地殼出現大翻動,以致於中國西北陸升,東南陸沉,故能感受到天空的日月星晨位置有位移情況。

    因此,前兩次並未帶來大陸華北先民帶來毀滅性災難,則又如何圓說Nibiru這次來臨竟能產生絕對性影響?

  • 蘇美人的歷史也有六千年
  • 這個也是我很納悶的問題

    發現nibiru的蘇美人也距今六千年
    不管是公轉一次需要3600或是5000

    應該有紀錄顯示人類曾遭遇這樣的大災難
  • nibiru
  • 我們對nibiru的身分真的很不了解


    有一說他是太陽的卵生兄弟
    有一說他是太陽系第十大行星
    有一說他的軌跡變幻莫測

    剛剛連到對岸去,有人認為nibiru兼具行星及彗星的特質
    他的軌道變幻難測 如彗星難以捉摸
    所以他每次接近地球的距離不一樣,造成的影響也不同

    這個理論跟nasa曾經發射衛星作過努力 但如今只能採守勢追蹤
    其實可以謀合

    但這種東西 就是信者恆信 不信者恆不信
    都可以互找出理論來反駁~~~

    以下貼文,請看~~

    太陽和太陰間有一個大的行星,它有地球4倍大,比地球重30倍。因太陰太陽的斜交軌道,它每次進入太陽和太陰附近的角度,軌道,時間,遠近,速度都有不同。但每3000到4000年就會在兩個恆星間走一圈。X星按期在兩個恆星間轉圈。由於X星比地球大,每次對地球都會造成不同程度的影響,因為X星每次對地球生命發展起了很大的作用。這就是毀滅後重生,生命不停進化。但地球上發展到現在的人類卻一無所知。

    看看最近一萬多年X星到來對地球的影響。1點 西元前1600年的磁極點,2點西元前5200年的磁極點,3點西元前8800年的磁極點,4點西元前12400年磁極點,5點西元前16000年磁極點。

    X星上有不同於地球的大氣,大氣在X星運行時不停的被拋向後面,X星穿越星空和小行星帶,還有在慧星帶,小行星帶吸附的大量石塊,冰塊,塵埃等物,形成了長長的慧尾,在離太陽近處可以與有長達3億公里以上的尾巴,在X星翻轉時其慧尾可能會掃過地球和其它行星。掃過地球時掃過處一全血紅,塵埃下落,紅色塵埃在天空中到處顯現,地球翻轉已無好多時間。X星是岩石表面,反射陽光較強,離太陽越近就越亮。雖然X星的外形有變化,但這不是異象,它是一顆未知的行星的正常軌跡。如果成龍形,加上反射陽光,某些地方可以看見9個太陽,這時就是最後的告戒時期。

    X星說是慧星,但又有行星的大小,還帶衛星,其最遠衛星離本星在一百多萬公里。說它不是慧星,卻有慧星的軌道。其軌道是週期性的也是非週期性的,週期性就是在週期性的運行,但其週期不固定。說是非週期的但它又在週期性橢圓軌道運行。X星變軌的可能性很高,因為其具有行星和慧星的兩種特性,變軌一般在幾個時期進入太陽系冥王星前,在太陽下,穿越黃道面時,在太陽上,離開太陽系冥王星後。本次X星軌道週期估計是3640年,上次軌道週期3770年,上上次軌道週期3940年,下次軌道週期預計在3560年。上上次X星穿越近日點是在地球軌道外一千多萬公里,上次X星穿越近日點是在地球軌道內一百萬公里,本次X星穿越近日點是在地球軌道內兩千萬公里,預計下次X星穿越近日點是在地球軌道內四千萬公里。在經過十次左右的穿越,X星有兩個結果,一是被太陽吸住成為繞太陽的真正太陽系第十大行星,二是軌道離太陽太近,而撞入太陽。那將是三萬年後的事,如果說本次文明是瑪雅說的第五紀文明,那三萬年後就是第六紀文明開始。預計X星被太陽系吸住繞太陽系運行有330次個週期,應該在太陽系存在了600多萬年,在木星軌道外運行了200多個週期,木星軌道內運行了100多個週期,對地球產生較大影響應該在10萬年左右。X星的衛星應該不是一直就是七個,可能會因為在在慧星帶,小行星帶,太陽系外等處吸附住其它小行星做衛星,然後在太陽系中穿越時因受太陽系其它行星影響而丟失掉衛星。所以其衛星不固定。對太陽系其它行星也有很大影響就不談了,只談對地球的影響。下面的預測軌道應該是可能性很高的,比雙星太陽系的秘密中軌道可能性更高。

    當這顆彗星和地球接近互相作用之時,許多因素影響穿過的精確時刻。當地球自轉變慢到停止的時候各板塊所在的精確位置。地殼移動之前地球的核心翻騰到什麼程度。因為有太多變量在影響,這些沒辦法準確預測。政府和其他人已經知道而且看到這顆彗星。他們之間正在討論這個問題。世界各地的政府選擇告訴他們的大眾什麼不清楚??現作任何猜測都可能會被證明是錯的。我們決定警告人們。想採取行動的可以行動。選擇忽略的則替他們自己以及他們所愛的人們做了決定。因缺乏能力不能採取行動的,可以平靜過他們的生活。


    B.地球地質變化
    在此前後的過程中,地球的變化如下:

    2010年8月前對地球都是造成的輕微影響

    輕微影響就是受X星和太陽的能量場影響,地球在中間做一個擺動,輕微影響期擺動幅度小,地球這個時期主要應對的是天氣異常,地殼軟流層在擺動下加速流動,地殼生溫。對地球基本無大的影響。大的災害數量很少。

    2010年8月後進入輕度影響

    X星接近後的輕度影響期,地球不光是擺動加大,而且在一定位置,特別是靠X星較近的位置出現了一定傾斜,黃赤交角有小幅變化。這時期主要應對的天氣異常,天氣造成的地質災害,次生災害,地殼軟流層在擺動下流動進一步加速,不光地殼升溫,還有就是地球板塊邊緣的各級地震。災害增多,影響範圍加大,地球上人類的的生產生活在某些地區變得嚴竣。但影響還在政府和人類生產生活能承受的一個範圍內。這個時期由於地質災害加重,在對城市影響較小,對縣,鄉,鎮,村等較偏的地區影響較大。

    2011年6月X星開始向黃道面上升,離地球越來越近,進入中度影響

    中度影響期地球擺動和傾斜進一步加大,黃赤交角有大幅變化。天氣更加異常,經常四季不分,地殼軟流層的加速流動在地殼增溫同時,還出現球板塊邊緣的各級地震向板塊內延展的現象,將在各個地震帶,也可能在人口密集區出現大量地震。火山也會受地球板塊移動而爆發,板塊移動造成的地殼變動到處可見。災害大面積展開,影響範圍加大,不管是城市還是縣,鄉,鎮,村的生產生活都受到影響,政府面對受災面積的擴大還能盡力維持。

  • 訪客
  • 天上又出現了另一個神祕的景象。有一條紅色的大戾龍,長著七個頭,十個角,每一個頭上都戴著王冠。

    大地劇烈地震動;太陽變黑,好像一塊黑麻布;月亮整個變為紅色,像血一般; 星星從天空墜落在地上,好像還沒有成熟的無花果被暴風從樹上吹落一樣。 天空像書卷被捲起來,不見了;山嶺和海島從原處被移開。 地上的君王、統治者、將領、有錢有勢的、奴隸,和自由人,都去躲在山洞和巖穴裏。 他們向山嶺和巖石呼喊:「倒在我們身上吧!把我們藏起來,好躲避坐在寶座上那位的臉和羔羊的義怒! 因為他們震怒的大日子到了;誰能站得住呢?」

    接著有閃電、雷轟、響聲、地震,和大冰雹。

    這獸又強迫所有的人,無論大小、貧窮富貴、奴隸或自由人,在他們的右手和額上打了印記。 這印記就是那獸的名字或代表名字的數字;沒有這印記的,就不能做買賣。

    《啟示錄》﹙《聖經》最後一卷﹚
  • to:72
  • 第一段: X星和七個衛星走向近地點,穿過黃道面,近日點.



    最後一段:國際金融網絡的壟斷者強迫人植入晶片,否則不能作買賣.
  • 訪客
  • 撒但要從囚禁中被釋放出來; 他要去迷惑地上四方的國家,就是歌革﹙喬治亞﹚和瑪各﹙亞塞拜然、亞美尼亞﹚。撒但要把他們集合起來,出去打仗;他們的人數像海灘上的沙那麼多。 他們遍滿全地,圍困上帝子民的營和他所愛的城。但是有火從天上降下,吞滅了他們。 那迷惑他們的魔鬼被扔到火與硫磺的湖裏去;那隻獸和假先知早已在那地方了。在那裏,他們要日夜受折磨,永不休止。


    《啟示錄》﹙《聖經》最後一卷﹚
  • 訪客
  • 天使說:「敘利亞王的終局快到時,埃及王將出兵攻打他。敘利亞王要動員他所有的軍力,用戰車、戰馬,和艦隊來反擊。他要侵略許多國家,像洪水一般氾濫大地, 甚至要侵入那美好之地,殺死成千上萬的人。 他侵犯那些國家時,連埃及也逃脫不了。 他要掠奪埃及珍藏的金銀財寶和其他貴重的東西。他要征服利比亞和古實﹙Kush,今日蘇丹共和國北部﹚。 後來從東方和北方傳來的風聲使他震驚;他會在盛怒下奮戰,殺盡滅絕許多人。 他要在大海和壯麗的聖山間支搭王家的大帳棚。但是他的死期到了,沒有人能救助他。」

    天使說:「那時,守護你同胞的天使長米迦勒要出現。然後將有一段災難時期,是立國以來最大的災難。在那時期,你同胞中名字登記在生命冊上的,都會得到拯救。」
  • 白話註釋
  • 『從無底坑上來』
    x星與七個衛星由下﹙南﹚往上﹙北﹚穿過黃道面或赤道面。


    『爭戰』
    魔鬼率領的某壟斷組織會在x星出現時,作出『敵基督』的大事。
    耶穌基督會為不屈服的人來擊敗魔鬼及其率領的某壟斷組織。
    屈服於某壟斷組織的人會不得安寧。
    不屈服的人會得永生。



    (只要極移的時候把某些地區放在新南北極就可以了)
  • to:69
  • 您把上上次的x星接近的不周山都查出來了  謝謝
    連同后意射日和大禹治水 一共三把鑰匙來解碼

      


    以前還是農業社會  以華夏文明為例 漢(西元前2世紀-後2世紀)人口五六千萬就號稱盛世 大週期結束時 人口通常只剩不到1/2

    現在工業社會 人口幾十倍以上


    西羅馬帝國崩潰時  退化成以物易物  小城(村)寡民  隔壁村都到死不相往來 和<老子>寫的差不多

  • 訪客
  • 假設檀香山﹙N 22°18’, W157°49’﹚是新南極,與台灣距離大圓航線80.5°。也就是說台灣位於新赤道南側9.5°,比現在的曼谷﹙N 13°﹚還靠近赤道。


    溫暖的陽光,熱帶風情。


    南緯十度︰熱熱熱
    南緯七十八度︰冰凍
    差很多。
  • 訪客
  • SETI
    From Wikipedia

    Screen shot of the screensaver for SETI@home, a distributed computing project in which volunteers donate idle computer power to analyze radio signals for signs of extraterrestrial intelligenceSearch for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI) is the collective name for a number of activities people undertake to search for intelligent extraterrestrial life. SETI projects use scientific methods to search for electromagnetic transmissions from civilizations on distant planets.[1][2] The United States government contributed to early SETI projects, but recent work has been primarily funded by private sources.

    There are great challenges in searching across the cosmos for a first transmission that could be characterized as intelligent, since its direction, spectrum and method of communication are all unknown beforehand. SETI projects necessarily make assumptions to narrow the search, the foremost being that electromagnetic radiation would be a medium of communication for advanced extraterrestrial life.[citation needed]

    On April 22, 2011, one project went into "hibernation" due to funding shortfalls for operations of the Allen Telescope Array (ATA) that provides data to SETI.[3]

    Contents [hide]
    1 Radio experiments
    1.1 Early work
    1.2 Sentinel, META, and BETA
    1.3 MOP and Project Phoenix
    1.4 The SETI League and Project Argus
    1.5 SETI@home
    1.6 Allen Telescope Array
    1.7 SETI Net
    1.8 Realized Interstellar Radio Message Projects
    1.9 Paper Projects
    2 Optical experiments
    3 Probe SETI and SETA experiments
    4 Fermi paradox
    5 Public information
    6 Criticism
    6.1 "Active" SETI
    7 See also
    8 References
    9 Further reading
    10 External links


    [edit] Radio experiments

    Microwave window as seen by a ground based system. From NASA report SP-419: SETI - the Search for Extraterrestrial IntelligenceMany radio frequencies penetrate our atmosphere quite well, and this led to radio telescopes that investigate the cosmos using large radio antennas. Furthermore, the earth emits considerable radio radiation as a byproduct of communications such as TV and radio, and these radiations would be easy to recognize as artificial due to their repetitive nature and narrow bandwidths. If this is typical, one way of discovering an extraterrestrial civilization might be to detect non-natural radio emissions from a location outside our Solar System.

    [edit] Early work
    As early as 1896, Nikola Tesla suggested that radio could be used to contact extraterrestrial life.[4] In 1899 while investigating atmospheric electricity using a Tesla coil receiver in his Knob Hill lab Tesla observed repetitive signals, substantially different from the signals noted from storms and Earth noise, that he interpreted as being of extraterrestrial origin. He later recalled the signals appeared in groups of one, two, three, and four clicks together. Tesla thought the signals were coming from Mars. Analysis of Tesla's research has ranged from suggestions that Tesla detected nothing (he simply was misunderstanding the new technology he was working with[5]) to claims that Tesla may have been observing naturally occurring Jovian plasma torus signals. In the early 1900s, Guglielmo Marconi, Lord Kelvin, and David Peck Todd also stated their belief that radio could be used to contact Martians (with Marconi stating that his stations had also picked up potential Martian signals).[6]

    On August 21–23, 1924, Mars entered an opposition closer to Earth than any time in a century before or since. In the United States, a "National Radio Silence Day" was promoted during a 36-hour period from the 21-23, with all radios quiet for five minutes on the hour, every hour. At the United States Naval Observatory, a radio receiver was lifted 3 kilometers above the ground in a dirigible tuned to a wavelength between 5 and 6 kilometers, using a "radio-camera" developed by Amherst College and Charles Francis Jenkins. The program was led by David Peck Todd with the military assistance of Admiral Edward W. Eberle (Chief of Naval Operations) and William F. Friedman (chief cryptographer of the US Army, who was assigned to translate any potential Martian messages).[7][8]

    A 1959 paper by Cocconi and Morrison first pointed out the possibility of searching the microwave spectrum, and proposed frequencies and a set of initial targets.[9]

    In 1960, Cornell University astronomer Frank Drake performed the first modern SETI experiment, named "Project Ozma", after the Queen of Oz in L. Frank Baum's fantasy books.[10] Drake used a 26-meter-diameter radio telescope at Green Bank, West Virginia, to examine the stars Tau Ceti and Epsilon Eridani near the 1.420 gigahertz marker frequency, a region of the radio spectrum dubbed the "water hole" due to its proximity to the H and OH spectral lines. A 400 kilohertz band was scanned around the marker frequency, using a single-channel receiver with a bandwidth of 100 hertz. The information was stored on tape for off-line analysis. He found nothing of great interest, but has continued a pro active involvement in the search for life beyond earth - for 50 years.

    The first SETI conference took place at Green Bank in 1961. The Soviets took a strong interest in SETI during the 1960s and performed a number of searches with omnidirectional antennas in the hope of picking up powerful radio signals. American astronomer Carl Sagan and Soviet astronomer Iosif Shklovskii together wrote the pioneering book in the field, Intelligent Life in the Universe which was published in 1966.[11]

    The first Kraus-style radio telescope was powered up in 1963. It was 360 feet (110 m) wide, 500 feet (150 m) long, and 70 feet (21 m) high. In the March 1955 issue of Scientific American, John Kraus described a concept to scan the cosmos for natural radio signals using a flat-plane radio telescope equipped with a parabolic reflector. Within two years, his concept was approved for construction by Ohio State University. With $71,000 total in grants from the National Science Foundation, construction began on a 20-acre plot in Delaware, Ohio. This Ohio State University radio telescope was called Big Ear. Later, it began the world's first continuous SETI program, called the Ohio State University SETI program.


    View of Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico with its 300 m dish- the world's largest. A small fraction of its observation time is devoted to SETI searches.In 1971, NASA funded a SETI study that involved Drake, Bernard Oliver of Hewlett-Packard Corporation, and others. The resulting report proposed the construction of an Earth-based radio telescope array with 1,500 dishes known as "Project Cyclops". The price tag for the Cyclops array was $10 billion USD. Cyclops was not built, but the report[12] formed the basis of much SETI work that followed.

    In 1974, a largely symbolic attempt was made at the Arecibo Observatory to send a message to other worlds. It was sent towards the globular star cluster M13, which is 25,000 light years from Earth.


    The WOW! Signal
    Credit: The Ohio State University Radio Observatory and the North American AstroPhysical Observatory (NAAPO).The OSU SETI program gained fame on August 15, 1977 when Jerry Ehman, a project volunteer, witnessed a startlingly strong signal received by the telescope. He quickly circled the indication on a printout and scribbled the phrase “Wow!” in the margin. This signal, dubbed the Wow! signal, is considered by some[who?] to be the most likely candidate from an artificial, extraterrestrial source ever discovered, but it has not been detected again in several additional searches.

    In 1979 the University of California, Berkeley launched a SETI project named "Search for Extraterrestrial Radio Emissions from Nearby Developed Intelligent Populations (SERENDIP)".[13] In 1986, UC Berkeley initiated their second SETI effort, SERENDIP II, and has continued with four more SERENDIP efforts to the present day. The latest incarnation of the SERENDIP project is SERENDIP V.v, a commensal all-sky survey using the Arecibo radio telescope began in June 2009.

    [edit] Sentinel, META, and BETA
    In 1980, Carl Sagan, Bruce Murray, and Louis Friedman founded the U.S. Planetary Society, partly as a vehicle for SETI studies.

    In the early 1980s, Harvard University physicist Paul Horowitz took the next step and proposed the design of a spectrum analyzer specifically intended to search for SETI transmissions. Traditional desktop spectrum analyzers were of little use for this job, as they sampled frequencies using banks of analog filters and so were restricted in the number of channels they could acquire. However, modern integrated-circuit digital signal processing (DSP) technology could be used to build autocorrelation receivers to check far more channels. This work led in 1981 to a portable spectrum analyzer named "Suitcase SETI" that had a capacity of 131,000 narrow band channels. After field tests that lasted into 1982, Suitcase SETI was put into use in 1983 with the 26-meter Harvard/Smithsonian radio telescope at Harvard, Massachusetts. This project was named "Sentinel", and continued into 1985.

    Even 131,000 channels weren't enough to search the sky in detail at a fast rate, so Suitcase SETI was followed in 1985 by Project "META", for "Megachannel Extra-Terrestrial Assay". The META spectrum analyzer had a capacity of 8.4 million channels and a channel resolution of 0.05 hertz. An important feature of META was its use of frequency doppler shift to distinguish between signals of terrestrial and extraterrestrial origin. The project was led by Horowitz with the help of the Planetary Society, and was partly funded by movie maker Steven Spielberg. A second such effort, META II, was begun in Argentina in 1990 to search the southern sky. META II is still in operation, after an equipment upgrade in 1996.

    The follow-on to META was named "BETA", for "Billion-channel ExtraTerrestrial Assay", and it commenced observation on October 30, 1995. The heart of BETA's processing capability consisted of 63 dedicated fast Fourier transform (FFT) engines, each capable of performing a 222-point complex FFTs in two seconds, and 21 general-purpose personal computers equipped with custom digital signal processing boards. This allowed BETA to receive 250 million simultaneous channels with a resolution of 0.5 hertz per channel. It scanned through the microwave spectrum from 1.400 to 1.720 gigahertz in eight hops, with two seconds of observation per hop. An important capability of the BETA search was rapid and automatic re-observation of candidate signals, achieved by observing the sky with two adjacent beams, one slightly to the east and the other slightly to the west. A successful candidate signal would first transit the east beam, and then the west beam and do so with a speed consistent with Earth's sidereal rotation rate. A third receiver observed the horizon to veto signals of obvious terrestrial origin. On March 23, 1999 the 26-meter radio telescope on which Sentinel, META and BETA were based was blown over by strong winds and seriously damaged. This forced the BETA project to cease operation.

    [edit] MOP and Project Phoenix

    Sensitivity vs range for SETI radio searches. The diagonal lnes show transmitters of different effective powers. The X axis is the sensitivity of the search. The Y axis on the right is the range in light years, and on the left is the number of sun-like stars within this range. The vertical line labeled SS is the typical sensitivity achieved by a full sky search, such as BETA above. The vertical line labeled TS is the typical sensitivity achieved by a targeted search such as Phoenix.[14]In 1992, the U.S. government funded an operational SETI program, in the form of the NASA Microwave Observing Program (MOP). MOP was planned as a long-term effort to conduct a general survey of the sky and also carry out targeted searches of 800 specific nearby stars. MOP was to be performed by radio antennas associated with the NASA Deep Space Network, as well as the 140-foot (43 m) radio telescope of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory at Green Bank, West Virginia and the 1,000-foot (300 m) radio telescope at the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico.. The signals were to be analyzed by spectrum analyzers, each with a capacity of 15 million channels. These spectrum analyzers could be grouped together to obtain greater capacity. Those used in the targeted search had a bandwidth of 1 hertz per channel, while those used in the sky survey had a bandwidth of 30 hertz per channel.

    MOP drew the attention of the U.S. Congress, where the program was ridiculed[15] and canceled a year after its start. SETI advocates continued without government funding, and in 1995 the nonprofit SETI Institute of Mountain View, California resurrected the MOP program under the name of Project "Phoenix", backed by private sources of funding. Project Phoenix, under the direction of Jill Tarter, is a continuation of the targeted search program from MOP and studies roughly 1,000 nearby Sun-like stars. From 1995 through March 2004, Phoenix conducted observations at the 64-meter Parkes radio telescope in Australia, the 140-foot (43 m) radio telescope of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Green Bank, West Virginia, and the 1,000-foot (300 m) radio telescope at the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico. The project observed the equivalent of 800 stars over the available channels in the frequency range from 1200 to 3000 MHz. The search was sensitive enough to pick up transmitters with 1 GW EIRP to a distance of about 200 light years.

    [edit] The SETI League and Project Argus
    Founded in 1994 in response to the US Congress cancellation of the NASA SETI program, The SETI League, Inc. is a membership-supported nonprofit organization with 1500 members in 62 countries on all seven continents. This grass-roots alliance of amateur and professional radio astronomers is headed by executive director emeritus Prof. H. Paul Shuch, the engineer credited with developing the world's first commercial home satellite TV receiver. Many SETI League members are licensed radio amateurs and microwave experimenters. Others are digital signal processing experts and computer enthusiasts.

    The SETI League pioneered the conversion of 3 to 5 metre diameter backyard satellite TV dishes into research-grade radio telescopes of modest sensitivity.[16] The organization concentrates on coordinating a global network of small, amateur-built radio telescopes under Project Argus, an all-sky survey seeking to achieve real-time coverage of the entire sky. Project Argus was conceived as a continuation of the all-sky survey component of the late NASA SETI program (the targeted search having been continued by the SETI Institute's Project Phoenix). There are currently 143 Project Argus radio telescopes operating in 27 countries. Project Argus instruments typically exhibit sensitivity on the order of 10−23 Watts/square metre, or roughly equivalent to that achieved by the Ohio State University Big Ear radio telescope in 1977, when it detected the landmark "Wow!" candidate signal.

    The name "Argus" derives from the mythical Greek guard-beast who had 100 eyes, and could see in all directions at once. In the SETI context, the name has been used for radio telescopes in fiction (Arthur C. Clarke, "Imperial Earth"; Carl Sagan, "Contact"), was the name initially used for the NASA study ultimately known as "Cyclops," and is the name given to an omnidirectional radio telescope design being developed at the Ohio State University.

    [edit] SETI@home

    SETI@home logoMain article: SETI@home
    SETI@home is a popular volunteer distributed computing project that was launched by the University of California, Berkeley in May 1999. It was originally funded by The Planetary Society and Paramount Pictures, and later by the state of California. The project is run by director David P. Anderson and chief scientist Dan Werthimer. Any individual can become involved with SETI research by downloading the Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC) software program, attaching to the SETI@home project, and allowing the program to run as a background process that uses idle computer power. The SETI@home program itself runs signal analysis on a "work unit" of data recorded from the central 2.5 MHz wide band of the SERENDIP IV instrument. After computation on the work unit is complete, the results are then automatically reported back to SETI@home servers at UC Berkeley. As of June 28, 2009 the SETI@home project has over 180,000 active participants volunteering a total of over 290,000 computers. These computers give SETI@home an average computational power of 617 teraFLOPS.[17] Radio source SHGb02+14a is the most interesting signal analyzed to date.[citation needed]

    [edit] Allen Telescope Array
    Main article: Allen Telescope Array
    The SETI Institute has been collaborating with the Radio Astronomy Laboratory at UC Berkeley to develop a specialized radio telescope array for SETI studies, something like a mini-Cyclops array. The array concept is named the "Allen Telescope Array" (ATA) (formerly, One Hectare Telescope [1HT]) after the project's benefactor Paul Allen. Its sensitivity will be equivalent to a single large dish more than 100 meters in diameter. The array is being constructed at the Hat Creek Observatory in rural northern California.[18]

    The full array is planned to consist of 350 or more Gregorian radio dishes, each 6.1 meters (20 ft) in diameter. These dishes are the largest producible with commercially available satellite television dish technology. The ATA was planned for a 2007 completion date, at a very modest cost of $25 million USD. The SETI Institute provides money for building the ATA while UC Berkeley designs the telescope and provides operational funding. Berkeley astronomers will use the ATA to pursue other deep space radio observations. The ATA is intended to support a large number of simultaneous observations through a technique known as "multibeaming", in which DSP technology is used to sort out signals from the multiple dishes. The DSP system planned for the ATA is extremely ambitious.

    The first portion of the array became operational in October 2007 with 42 antennas. Completion of the full 350 element array will depend on funding and the technical results from the 42-element sub-array.

    CNET published an article and pictures about the Allen Telescope Array (ATA) on December 12, 2008.[19][20]

    In April 2011, the ATA was forced to enter 'hibernation' due to funding shortfalls, and is currently inactive.

    [edit] SETI Net
    SETI Net is a private search system created by a single individual. It is closely affiliated with the SETI League and is one of the project Argus stations (DM12jw).

    The SETI Net station consists of off-the-shelf, consumer-grade electronics to minimize cost and to allow this design to be replicated as simply as possible. It has a 3-meter parabolic antenna that can be directed in azimuth and elevation, an LNA that covers the 1420 MHz spectrum, a receiver to reproduce the wideband audio, and a standard PC as the control device and for deploying the detection algorithms.

    The antenna can be pointed and locked to one sky location, enabling the system to integrate on it for long periods. Currently the Wow! signal area is being monitored when it is above the horizon, but all search data are collected and made available on the internet archive.

    SETI Net started operation in the early 1980s as a way to learn about the science of the search, and has developed several software packages for the amateur SETI community. It has provided an astronomical clock, a file manager to keep track of SETI data files, a spectrum analyzer optimized for amateur SETI, remote control of the station from the internet, and other packages.

    [edit] Realized Interstellar Radio Message Projects
    The first Interstellar Radio Message (IRM), "Arecibo Message", was transmitted in Nov, 1974 from Arecibo Radar Telescope. IRMs Cosmic Call, Teen Age Message, Cosmic Call 2, A Message From Earth were transmitted in 1999, 2001, 2003 and 2008 from Evpatoria Planetary Radar.

    Additional information presents at: Communication with Extraterrestrial Intelligence, Active SETI, List of interstellar radio messages.

    [edit] Paper Projects
    A large number of paper projects also exist. For example, directed by Douglas Vakoch at the SETI Institute in Mountain View CA, the Interstellar Message Composition Project is charged with designing messages that could presumably be sent to extraterrestrials that convey basic scientific or mathematical principles, as well as human altruism. Vackoch's idea is to send a message of reciprocal altruism because hopefully any extraterrestrials would reciprocate with a reply back.

    Vakoch has founded "Encoding Altruism", a workshop that started in 2003 in Paris that brings together anthropologists, philosophers, physicists, astronomers, theologians, musicians, and artists to address the challenge of communicating with extraterrestrials in a language and syntax that would be intelligible to an alien civilization.

    Vakoch's most recent research is highlighted through Greater Good Science Center, University of California, Berkeley.

    [edit] Optical experiments
    While most SETI sky searches have studied the radio spectrum, some SETI researchers have considered the possibility that alien civilizations might be using powerful lasers for interstellar communications at optical wavelengths. The idea was first suggested by R. N. Schwartz and Charles Hard Townes in a 1961 paper published in the journal Nature titled "Interstellar and Interplanetary Communication by Optical Masers". In 1983, Townes, one of the inventors of the laser, published a detailed study of the idea in the US journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Most SETI researchers agreed with the idea.

    The 1971 Cyclops study discounted the possibility of optical SETI, reasoning that construction of a laser system that could outshine the bright central star of a remote star system would be too difficult.

    Some SETI advocates, such as Frank Drake, have suggested that such a judgment was too conservative; early 21st century humans have no means of knowing how a superior technology is communicating or would communicate, and negative results may simply mean humans are making the wrong searches.[citation needed]

    There are two problems with optical SETI. The first problem is that lasers are highly "monochromatic", that is, they emit light only on one frequency, making it troublesome to figure out what frequency to look for.

    However, according to the uncertainty principle, emitting light in narrow pulses results in a broad spectrum of emission; the spread in frequency becomes higher as the pulse width becomes narrower, making it easier to detect an emission.

    The other problem is that while radio transmissions can be broadcast in all directions, lasers are highly directional. This means that a laser beam could be easily blocked by clouds of interstellar dust, and Earth would have to cross its direct line of fire by chance to receive it.

    Optical SETI supporters have conducted paper studies[21] of the effectiveness of using contemporary high-energy lasers and a ten-meter focus mirror as an interstellar beacon. The analysis shows that an infrared pulse from a laser, focused into a narrow beam by such a mirror, would appear thousands of times brighter than the Sun to a distant civilization in the beam's line of fire. The Cyclops study proved incorrect in suggesting a laser beam would be inherently hard to see.

    Such a system could be made to automatically steer itself through a target list, sending a pulse to each target at a constant rate. This would allow targeting of all Sun-like stars within a distance of 100 light-years. The studies have also described an automatic laser pulse detector system with a low-cost, two-meter mirror made of carbon composite materials, focusing on an array of light detectors. This automatic detector system could perform sky surveys to detect laser flashes from civilizations attempting contact.

    In the 1980s, two Soviet researchers conducted a short optical SETI search, but turned up nothing. During much of the 1990s, the optical SETI cause was kept alive through searches by Stuart Kingsley, a dedicated British amateur living in the US state of Ohio.

    Several optical SETI experiments are now in progress. A Harvard-Smithsonian group that includes Paul Horowitz designed a laser detector and mounted it on Harvard's 155 centimeter (61 inch) optical telescope. This telescope is currently being used for a more conventional star survey, and the optical SETI survey is "piggybacking" on that effort. Between October 1998 and November 1999, the survey inspected about 2,500 stars. Nothing that resembled an intentional laser signal was detected, but efforts continue. The Harvard-Smithsonian group is now working with Princeton University to mount a similar detector system on Princeton's 91-centimeter (36-inch) telescope. The Harvard and Princeton telescopes will be "ganged" to track the same targets at the same time, with the intent being to detect the same signal in both locations as a means of reducing errors from detector noise.

    The Harvard-Smithsonian group is now building a dedicated all-sky optical survey system along the lines of that described above, featuring a 1.8-meter (72-inch) telescope. The new optical SETI survey telescope is being set up at the Oak Ridge Observatory in Harvard, Massachusetts.

    The University of California, Berkeley, home of SERENDIP and SETI@home, is also conducting optical SETI searches. One is being directed by Geoffrey Marcy, an extrasolar planet hunter, and involves examination of records of spectra taken during extrasolar planet hunts for a continuous, rather than pulsed, laser signal. The other Berkeley optical SETI effort is more like that being pursued by the Harvard-Smithsonian group and is being directed by Dan Werthimer of Berkeley, who built the laser detector for the Harvard-Smithsonian group. The Berkeley survey uses a 76-centimeter (30-inch) automated telescope at Leuschner Observatory and an older laser detector built by Werthimer.

    Another form of searching for intelligent life that also makes available lower level life-forms was proposed in the July/August 2010 issue of American Astronautical Society's "Space Times" magazine. Titled "Deep Space Astrobiology" an Exoplanet Explorer Spacecraft at the L2 Lagrangian position uses cooled infrared spectroscopy to investigate exoplanet atmospheres. The "Lally Life-forms Probability Index" is discussed for evaluating exoplanet spectra.

    [edit] Probe SETI and SETA experiments
    The possibility of using interstellar messenger probes in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence was first suggested by Ronald N. Bracewell in 1960 (see Bracewell probe), and the technical feasibility of this approach was demonstrated by the British Interplanetary Society's starship study Project Daedalus in 1978. Starting in 1979, Robert Freitas advanced arguments [22][23][24] for the proposition that physical space-probes are a superior mode of interstellar communication to radio signals. See Voyager Golden Record.

    In recognition that any sufficiently advanced interstellar probe in the vicinity of Earth could easily monitor our terrestrial Internet, Invitation to ETI was established by Prof. Allen Tough in 1996, as a Web-based SETI experiment inviting such spacefaring probes to establish contact with humanity. The project's 100 Signatories includes prominent physical, biological, and social scientists, as well as artists, educators, entertainers, philosophers and futurists. Prof. H. Paul Shuch, executive director emeritus of The SETI League, serves as the project's Principal Investigator.

    In a 2004 paper ,[25] C. Rose and G. Wright showed that inscribing a message in matter and transporting it to an interstellar destination can be enormously more energy efficient than communication using electromagnetic waves if delays larger than light transit time can be tolerated. That said, for simple messages such as "hello," radio SETI could be far more efficient .[26] If energy requirement is used as a proxy for technical difficulty, then a solarcentric Search for Extraterrestrial Artifacts (SETA) [27] may be a useful supplement to traditional radio or optical searches.[28][29]

    Much like the "preferred frequency" concept in SETI radio beacon theory, the Earth-Moon or Sun-Earth libration orbits [30] might therefore constitute the most universally convenient parking places for automated extraterrestrial spacecraft exploring arbitrary stellar systems. A viable long-term SETI program may be founded upon a search for these objects.

    In 1979, Freitas and Valdes conducted a photographic search of the vicinity of the Earth-Moon triangular libration points L4 and L5, and of the solar-synchronized positions in the associated halo orbits, seeking possible orbiting extraterrestrial interstellar probes, but found nothing to a detection limit of about 14th magnitude.[30] The authors conducted a second, more comprehensive photographic search for probes in 1982 [31] that examined the five Earth-Moon Lagrangian positions and included the solar-synchronized positions in the stable L4/L5 libration orbits, the potentially stable nonplanar orbits near L1/L2, Earth-Moon L3, and also L2 in the Sun-Earth system. Again no extraterrestrial probes were found to limiting magnitudes of 17-19th magnitude near L3/L4/L5, 10-18th magnitude for L1/L2, and 14-16th magnitude for Sun-Earth L2.

    In June 1983, Valdes and Freitas [32] used the 26 m radiotelescope at Hat Creek Radio Observatory to search for the tritium hyperfine line at 1516 MHz from 108 assorted astronomical objects, with emphasis on 53 nearby stars including all visible stars within a 20 light-year radius. The tritium frequency was deemed highly attractive for SETI work because (1) the isotope is cosmically rare, (2) the tritium hyperfine line is centered in the SETI waterhole region of the terrestrial microwave window, and (3) in addition to beacon signals, tritium hyperfine emission may occur as a byproduct of extensive nuclear fusion energy production by extraterrestrial civilizations. The wideband- and narrowband-channel observations achieved sensitivities of 5-14 x 10−21 W/m²/channel and 0.7-2 x 10−24 W/m²/channel, respectively, but no detections were made.

    Traces of targeted asteroid mining on asteroids and comets could also be utilized for the search of ETI.[33]

    [edit] Fermi paradox
    Main article: Fermi paradox
    Italian physicist Enrico Fermi suggested in the 1950s that if technologically advanced civilizations are common in the universe, then they should be detectable in one way or another. (According to those who were there,[34] Fermi either asked "Where are they?" or "Where is everybody?")

    The Fermi paradox can be stated more completely as follows:

    The size and age of the universe incline us to believe that many technologically advanced civilizations must exist. However, this belief seems logically inconsistent with our lack of observational evidence to support it. Either (1) the initial assumption is incorrect and technologically advanced intelligent life is much rarer than we believe, or (2) our current observations are incomplete and we simply have not detected them yet, or (3) our search methodologies are flawed and we are not searching for the correct indicators.
    Possible explanations for the paradox suggest, for example, that while simple life may well be abundant in the universe, intelligent life may be exceedingly rare. In 2000, Peter Ward, professor of Biology and of Earth and Space Sciences at the University of Washington authored a book claiming the Rare Earth hypothesis. In short, the theory claims that the emergence of complex multicellular life (metazoa) on Earth required an extremely unlikely combination of astrophysical and geological events and circumstances. This hypothesis contradicts the principle of mediocrity, which SETI takes as an assumption.

    Another suggestion, made by astrophysicist Ray Norris in 2000[35] (and subsequently by Allen Tough[36]) was that gamma-ray burst events are sufficiently frequent to sterilize vast swaths of galactic real-estate. This idea was subsequently popularized by physicist Arnon Dar, and described in the show Death Star on PBS Nova.[37]

    Science writer Timothy Ferris has posited that since galactic societies are most likely only transitory, an obvious solution is an interstellar communications network, or a type of library consisting mostly of automated systems. They would store the cumulative knowledge of vanished civilizations and communicate that knowledge through the galaxy. Ferris calls this the "Interstellar Internet", with the various automated systems acting as network "servers".

    If such an Interstellar Internet exists, the hypothesis states, communications between servers are mostly through narrow-band, highly directional radio or laser links. Intercepting such signals is, as discussed earlier, very difficult. However, the network could maintain some broadcast nodes in hopes of making contact with new civilizations.

    Although somewhat dated in terms of "information culture" arguments, not to mention the obvious technological problems of a system that could work effectively for billions of years and requires multiple lifeforms agreeing on certain basics of communications technologies, this hypothesis is actually testable (see below).

    An alternate hypothesis is that evolutionary pressures in many environments favor species which rapidly consume available resources once they achieve dominance. By the time they have achieved sufficient technology to come to the notice of other civilizations, they are already well on their way to exhausting the resources of their host planet. Therefore the time period available for communication is finite, and very small compared with planetary timescales.

    [edit] Public information
    The International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) has a long-standing SETI Permanent Study Group (SPSG, formerly called the IAA SETI Committee), which addresses matters of SETI science, technology, and international policy. The SPSG meets in conjunction with the International Astronautical Congress (IAC) held annually at different locations around the world, and sponsors two SETI Symposia at each IAC.

    In 2005, the International Academy of Astronautics established the SETI: Post-Detection Science and Technology Taskgroup (Chairman, Professor Paul Davies) "to act as a Standing Committee to be available to be called on at any time to advise and consult on questions stemming from the discovery of a putative signal of extraterrestrial intelligent (ETI) origin." It will use, in part, the Rio Scale to evaluate the importance of releasing the information to the public.

    [edit] Criticism
    As various SETI projects have progressed, some have criticized early claims by researchers as being too "euphoric" or "optimistic." For example, Peter Schenkel, while remaining a supporter of SETI projects, has written that "[i]n light of new findings and insights, it seems appropriate to put excessive euphoria to rest and to take a more down-to-earth view ... We should quietly admit that the early estimates — that there may be a million, a hundred thousand, or ten thousand advanced extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy — may no longer be tenable."[1] Clive Trotman presents some sobering but realistic calculations emphasizing the timeframe dimension.[38]

    SETI has also occasionally been the target of criticism by those who suggest that it is a form of pseudoscience. In particular, critics allege that no observed phenomena suggest the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence, and furthermore that the assertion of the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence has no good Popperian criteria for falsifiability.[39]

    In response, SETI advocates note, among other things, that the Drake Equation was never a hypothesis, and so never intended to be testable, nor to be "solved"; it was merely a clever representation of the agenda for the world's first scientific SETI meeting in 1961, and it serves as a tool in formulating testable hypotheses. Further, they note that the existence of intelligent life on Earth is a plausible reason to expect it elsewhere, and that individual SETI projects have clearly defined "stop" conditions. Many detractors have not considered the collection and processing of data, the first order of business, and the refining of those data streams, in the case of SETI through algorithm optimization. To justify SETI projects does not require an acceptance of the Drake equation. Science proceeds through hypothesis. If one were to only take what was at face value observable, many scientific phenomena never would have been discovered.

    The search for extraterrestrial intelligence is not an assertion that extraterrestrial intelligence exists or are visiting earth, and conflating the two can be seen as a straw man argument. There is an effort to distinguish the SETI projects from UFOlogy, the study of UFOs, which many consider to be pseudoscience. In Skeptical Inquirer, Mark Moldwin argued that the important differences between the two projects were the acceptance of SETI by the mainstream scientific community and that "[t]he methodology of SETI leads to useful scientific results even in the absence of discovery of alien life."[40]

    Some in the UFO community, such as nuclear physicist Stanton Friedman, say there is no basis for the search and it is therefore unscientific. Friedman has challenged SETI specialists to debate the issues, with no takers so far.[41] Examples of objections to SETI include questioning energy requirements as well as why advanced civilizations would use radio.

    [edit] "Active" SETI
    Main article: Active SETI
    Active SETI (also known as METI = "Messaging to Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence") consists of sending signals into space in the hope that they will be picked up by an alien intelligence. Physicist Stephen Hawking, in his book A Brief History of Time, suggests that "alerting" extraterrestrial intelligences of our existence is foolhardy, citing mankind's history of treating his fellow man harshly in meetings of civilizations with a significant technology gap. He suggests, in view of this history, that we "lay low".

    The concern over SETI was raised by the science journal Nature in an editorial in October 2006, which commented on a recent meeting of the International Academy of Astronautics SETI study group. The editor said, "It is not obvious that all extraterrestrial civilizations will be benign, or that contact with even a benign one would not have serious repercussions" (Nature Vol 443 12 Oct 06 p 606). Astronomer and science fiction author David Brin has expressed similar concerns.[42]

    As was suggested by Richard Carrigan, a particle physicist at the US Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois, 'passive' SETI could also be dangerous in the style of computer viruses.[43] Computer security expert Bruce Schneier dismissed this possibility as a "bizarre movie-plot threat". [44]

    To lend a quantitative basis to discussions of the risks of transmitting deliberate messages from Earth, the SETI Permanent Study Group of the International Academy of Astronautics adopted in 2007 a new analytical tool, the San Marino Scale.[45] Developed by Prof. Ivan Almar and Prof. H. Paul Shuch, the scale evaluates the significance of transmissions from Earth as a function of signal intensity and information content. Its adoption suggests that not all such transmissions are equal, thus each must be evaluated separately before establishing blanket international policy regarding Active SETI.[citation needed]

    But some scientists consider these fears about the dangers of METI as panic and irrational superstition; see, for example, Alexander L. Zaitsev's papers.[46][47]

    [edit] See also
    Alien language
    Arecibo Message
    Astrobiology
    Astrobiology Science and Technology for Exploring Planets (ASTEP)
    The Big Ear: The Ohio State University Radio Observatory
    Darwin Mission
    First contact
    Metalaw
    Iosif Shklovsky
    Open SonATA
    SETI@home
    setiQuest
    Space archaeology
    Terrestrial Planet Finder


    [edit] References
    ^ a b Schenkel, Peter (May 2006). "SETI Requires a Skeptical Reappraisal". Skeptical Inquirer. http://www.csicop.org/si/2006-03/seti.html. Retrieved June 28, 2009. [dead link]
    ^ Moldwin, Mark (November 2004). "Why SETI is science and UFOlogy is not". Skeptical Inquirer. http://www.csicop.org/si/2004-11/.
    ^ The Great Beyond. Nature Blogs, ed (25 abril 2011). "SETI scope suspends search". http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2011/04/seti_scope_suspends_search.html.
    ^ Seifer, Marc J. (1996). "Martian Fever (1895-1896)". Wizard : the life and times of Nikola Tesla : biography of a genius. Secaucus, New Jersey: Carol Pub.. pp. 157. ISBN 978-1-55-972329-9. OCLC 33865102.
    ^ Spencer, John (1991). The UFO Encyclopedia. New York: Avon Books. ISBN 978-0-38-076887-5. OCLC 26211869.
    ^ Corum, Kenneth L.; James F. Corum (1996) (PDF). Nikola Tesla and the electrical signals of planetary origin. pp. 1, 6, 14. OCLC 68193760. http://www.teslasociety.com/mars.pdf.
    ^ Dick, Steven (1999). The Biological Universe: The Twentieth Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate. ISBN 0521343267.
    ^ Letters of Note: Prepare for Contact
    ^ Cocconi, G., and Morrison, P. (1959). "Searching for Interstellar Communication". Nature 184 (844).
    ^ "Science: Project Ozma," Time, Apr. 18, 1960 (web version accessed 17 September 2010)
    ^ Sagan, Carl; Iosif Shklovskii (1966). Intelligent Life in the Universe. ISBN 0330251252.
    ^ "Project Cyclops: A design study of a system for detecting extraterrestial intelligent life". NASA. 1971. http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19730010095_1973010095.pdf. Retrieved June 28, 2009.
    ^ "SERENDIP". UC Berkeley. http://seti.ssl.berkeley.edu/serendip/. Retrieved 2006-06-12.
    ^ Wolfe, JH et al (1979). "CP-2156, Chapter 5.5. SETI - The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence: Plans and Rationale". NASA. http://history.nasa.gov/CP-2156/ch5.5.htm. Retrieved July 1, 2009.
    ^ "Ear to the Universe Is Plugged by Budget Cutters". The New York Times. October 7, 1993. http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/07/us/ear-to-the-universe-is-plugged-by-budget-cutters.html?pagewanted=1/. Retrieved May 23, 2010.
    ^ Chown, Marcus (April 1997). "The Alien Spotters". New Scientist: 28. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg15420784.500-the-alien-spotters.html. Retrieved 2008-04-13.
    ^ de Zutter, Willy. "SETI@home — Credit Overview". BOINCstats. http://www.boincstats.com/stats/project_graph.php?pr=sah. Retrieved June 28, 2009.
    ^ "Allen Telescope Array General Overview". SETI Institute. Archived from the original on 2006-04-28. http://web.archive.org/web/20060428102322/http://www.seti.org/site/pp.asp?c=ktJ2J9MMIsE&b=179146. Retrieved 2006-06-12.
    ^ http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-10121889-52.html
    ^ http://news.cnet.com/2300-11397_3-6248324-1.html?tag=mncol
    ^ Exers, Ronald, D. Cullers, J. Billingham, L. Scheffer (editors) (2003). SETI 2020: A Roadmap for the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence. SETI Press. ISBN 0-9666335-3-9.
    ^ Freitas Jr., Robert A. (1980). "Interstellar probes — A new approach to SETI". http://www.rfreitas.com/Astro/InterstellarProbesJBIS1980.htm. Retrieved June 28, 2009.
    ^ Freitas Jr., Robert A (1983). "Debunking the Myths of Interstellar Probes". http://www.rfreitas.com/Astro/ProbeMyths1983.htm. Retrieved June 28, 2009.
    ^ Freitas Jr., Robert A. (1983). "The Case for Interstellar Probes". http://www.rfreitas.com/Astro/TheCaseForInterstellarProbes1983.htm. Retrieved June 28, 2009.
    ^ C. Rose and G. Wright (2 September 2004). "Inscribed matter as an energy efficient means of communication with an extraterrestrial civilization". Nature 431 (7004): 47–49. Bibcode 2004Natur.431...47R. doi:10.1038/nature02884. PMID 15343327. http://www.winlab.rutgers.edu/~crose/papers/nature.pdf.
    ^ Woodruff T. Sullivan. (2 September 2004). "Message in a bottle". Nature Magazine 431 (7004): 27–28.
    ^ Freitas Jr., Robert A (November 1983). "The Search for Extraterrestrial Artifacts (SETA)". http://www.rfreitas.com/Astro/SETAJBISNov1983.htm. Retrieved June 28, 2009.
    ^ Editors (8 September 2004). "NY Times Editorial". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/08/opinion/08wed3.html?_r=1&ex=1252382400&en=5d6483f134ede447&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland.
    ^ Rose, Christopher (September 2004). "Cosmic Communications". http://www.winlab.rutgers.edu/~crose/cgi-bin/cosmicB.html. Retrieved August 1, 2010.
    ^ a b Freitas Jr., Robert A; Valdes, Francisco (1980). "A Search for Natural or Artificial Objects Located at the Earth-Moon Libration Points". http://www.rfreitas.com/Astro/SearchIcarus1980.htm. Retrieved June 28, 2009.
    ^ Valdes, Francisco \ last2=Freitas Jr. (1983). "A Search for Objects near the Earth-Moon Lagrangian Points". http://www.rfreitas.com/Astro/SearchIcarus1983.htm.
    ^ Valdes, Francisco \ last2=Freitas Jr. (1986). "A Search for the Tritium Hyperfine Line from Nearby Stars". http://www.rfreitas.com/Astro/TritiumSearch1986.htm.
    ^ Evidence of asteroid mining in our galaxy may lead to the discovery of extraterrestrial civilizations smithsonianscience.org; Asteroid Mining: A Marker for SETI? centauri-dreams.org; Duncan Forgan, Martin Elvis:Extrasolar Asteroid Mining as Forensic Evidence for Extraterrestrial Intelligence@ arxiv.org, (Retrieved 2011-04-07)
    ^ Jones, Eric (March 1985). ""Where is everybody?", An account of Fermi's question". Los Alamas National Laboratory. http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/la-10311-ms.pdf. Retrieved June 28, 2009.
    ^ "How old is ET". Acta Astronautica 2-9: 731–733. 2000.
    ^ Tough, Allen (2000). When SETI Succeeds: The Impact of High-Information Contact. Bellevue, Washington: Foundation For the Future. ISBN 0-9677252-2-4.
    ^ "NOVA Online – Death Star". PBS. 2002. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/gamma/. Retrieved June 28, 2009.
    ^ Trotman, Clive (2004). The Feathered Onion — Creation of Life in the Universe. Wiley. ISBN 0470871873.
    ^ http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7262/full/461316a.html
    ^ Williams, Peter S. "If SETI is Science and UFOlogy Is Not, Which Is Intelligent Design Theory?". http://www.arn.org/docs/williams/pw_setivsufology.htm. Retrieved June 28, 2009.
    ^ Friedman, Stanton (May 2002). "UFOs: Challenge to SETI Specialists". http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/sfufovsseti.html.
    ^ Brin, David (June 2006). "Shouting at the Cosmos". Lifeboat Foundation. http://lifeboat.com/ex/shouting.at.the.cosmos. Retrieved June 28, 2009.
    ^ Carrigan Jr., Robert A. (June 2006). "Do potential SETI signals need to be decontaminated?". Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. http://home.fnal.gov/~carrigan/SETI/SETI_Hacker_AC-03-IAA-8-3-06.pdf.
    ^ "A Science-Fiction Movie-Plot Threat". http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/11/a_sciencefictio.html. Retrieved March 13, 2011.
    ^ Almár, Ivan. "The San Marino Scale". International Academy of Astronautics [http://iaaseti.org/smiscale.htm.
    ^ Zaitsev, Alexander L. (September 2007). "Sending and searching for interstellar messages". 58th International Astronautical Congress. http://fire.relarn.ru/126/docs/iac_07_a4_2.02.pdf.
    ^ Zaitsev, Alexander L. (April 2008). "Detection probability of terrestrial radio signals by a hostile super-civilization". Journal of Radio Electronics 5. http://jre.cplire.ru/jre/may08/2/text_e.html.
    Books collection on SETI http://zend2.com/Def.php?u=Oi8vdWZvbG9neWJvb2tzLmNvbS9pbmRleC5waHA%2FYz0xNiZ4PVNFVEk%3D&b=5

    [edit] Further reading
    Wikimedia Commons has media related to: SETI
    McConnell, Brian; Chuck Toporek (2001). Beyond Contact: A Guide to SETI and Communicating with Alien Civilizations. O'Reilly. ISBN 0-596-00037-5.
    Perelmuter, J.M. (2006). The Sinusoidal Spaghetti. iUniverse. ISBN 0-595-41713-2.
    MJ Carlotto (2007). "Detecting Patterns of a Technological Intelligence in Remotely Sensed Imagery". J British Interplanetary Society 60: 28–39. http://spsr.utsi.edu/articles/markjbis2007.pdf.
    John B Campbell (2006). "Archaeology and direct imaging of exoplanets". In C. Aime & F. Vakili. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. Cambridge University Press. pp. 247 ff. ISBN 0-521-85607-8. http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/1027/1/S1743921306009392a.pdf.
    Frank White: The Seti Factor – How the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Is Changing Our View of the Universe and Ourselves. Walker & Company, New York 1990, ISBN 978-0-8027-1105-2
    David W. Swift: Seti Pioneers — Scientists Talk about Their Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence. Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson 1993, ISBN 0-8165-1119-5
    P.Morrison, J.Billingham, J.Wolfe: The search for extraterrestrial intelligence-SETI. NASA SP, Washington 1977,online
    Brian MacConnell: Beyond contact - a guide to SETI and communicating with Alien civilizations. O'Reilly, Beijing 2001, ISBN 0-596-00037-5.
    [edit] External links
    Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence
    The eerie silence Expanding the parameters of the search for technological and evolutionary footprints of extrasolar civilizations , beyond only radio signals. (Physics World). Mar 2, 2010.
    Series of 90 videos of SETI Talks, by setiinstitute on YouTube
    Passage of radiation through wormholes of arbitrary shape by R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko
    wow-signal engrypted
  • 訪客
  • TO#79格友:請問您檀香山是新南極的假設是根據何種說法?
    這和目前得到的訊息相差十萬八千里,
    如果只是單純個人假設,那麼請澄清一下
    如果其來有自,請公佈消息來源好讓大家參考
    因為台灣未來可能的緯度會影響到大家為未來所做的準備.
    喔!好像是版主回覆時提出的新版本,
    請版主告訴大家訊息來自何處囉!
    而且從印度往東到夏威夷的距離小於往西到夏威夷的距離
    這版本符合邏輯嗎?亦或我才疏學淺,請不吝賜教.
  • Fred是查詢這幾天格友們所po的各種訊息後,
    所看到的第二種版本。

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/05/02 21:08

  • 訪客
  • 剛看到電視某位名嘴說:其實台灣有一位建築師有參加"雙子星大廈"的建造...他曾經訪問過這位建築師,這位建築師說:雙子星會倒是因為炸對樓...
    現在說話都可以無憑無據?真是一個很oxx的世界...
  • 這位名嘴所提的建築師就是先父王公諱昭藩!
    先父一直跟Fred說:
    「雙子星大廈不可能就因為一台飛機而這麼徹底的崩毀…」
    這位名嘴可是姓李的女性嗎?

    FrederickWang replied in 2011/05/03 00:01

  • 訪客
  • 炸對樓層
  • 訪客
  • 手誤...因該說飛機撞對樓層
  • to84
  • 所以教你關掉電視

    不是氣死就是笨死
  • 訪客
  • 剛氣一個一直打錯...難怪人類大腦總是用不太到...
    因為實在太腦殘了...
  • 訪客
  • 現在正在重播...是"資深媒體人陳高超"先生口中說出來的...
  • 訪客
  • 自轉南北極必需成對為對心點
    North - Earth Center - South連成一直線
    由經緯度可算



    緯度方向相反 絕對值一樣
    經度方向相反 絕對值相加等於180度 在地球移上成為一個通過地心的平面



    距離不能直接經緯度相減  或直接用畢式定理  因為球面上三角形內角和 恆大於180度  小於270度   距離越遠越不能用直接用畢氏定理
    要用大圓航線  不能用小圓航線


    請參考球面幾何  天文航海  六分儀  的用法  

    所以印度和巴西不可能是一組南北極
    印度 配智利外海
    巴西 配硫璜島


    夏威儀更不可能配印度  


    要算對心點


    台灣的對心點  在南美內陸 某前西班牙殖民地

    所以假設南美是新北極或南極  則台灣會變另一個軸極

    巴西聖保羅和里約熱內盧之間 對日本硫璜島和沖繩島之間  離台灣大圓航線十二度  新南緯七十八度  相當於現在南級洲  冷冷冷  新夏至比現在冬至的日照還少  cos (78-23.5) < cos(23.5+23.5)




  • 訪客
  • 嘉義台中之間的地軸對心點是南美洲巴拉圭亞松森市
    冷冷冷
  • silver-knights
  • 本人愚昧,但且供一個方向思考:
    板塊會擠壓位移,而地型地貌也會有所改變
  • to:90
  • 一言驚醒夢中人

    謝謝

    我只關心台灣離新南北極的大圓航線的夾角  也就是新緯度的補角
  • 訪客
  • 球面三角學
    维基百科

    球面三角球面三角學是球面幾何學的一部分,主要在處理、發現和解釋多邊形 (特別是三角形) 在球面上的角與邊的聯繫和關聯。在天文學上的重要性是用於計算天體軌道和地球表面與太空航行時的天文導航。

    目錄 [隐藏]
    1 球面上的線
    2 恆等式
    3 參見
    4 外部鏈結


    [編輯] 球面上的線
    在球殼的表面,最短的距離是大圓上接近直線的弧線,也就是圓弧的圓心與球殼的球心是同一點。例如:地球上的子午線和赤道都是大圓。所謂行星表面的直線,就是球面上兩點之間最近距離的大圓弧線(如果你把自己拘束在球面上的直線上)。(參看:大地測量學)

    在球面上,由大圓的弧所包圍的區域稱為球面多邊形,但要注意,不同於平面上的情形,在球面上』雙角』是可能存在的。(兩個弧夾出兩個角的三角形類似物)(可由剝橘子時剝下來的橘子皮想像)

    這些多邊形的邊長(弧長),可以利用球心角很方便的來測定,將弧的兩端所對應的球心角乘上半徑便是邊長。要注意的是,這些角都必須用弳度量來量度。.

    因此,對一個球面三角形而言,是由他的弧長與球心角來具體描述的,只是弧的長度是用弳度量來標示。

    值得注意的是,球面三角形的三個內角的和總是大於180°,但在平面上只有180°。超過180°的數值稱為球面剩餘 E:E = α + β + γ - 180°,這些結餘給出了球面三角形的面積。確定這個值,球面剩餘必須以弳度量來測定,表面積A依據球面的半徑和球面剩餘來測量:

    A = R2 • E
    這是高斯-邦奈定理,這很明顯的顯示沒有相似的球面三角形(三角形有相同的角,但邊長和面積不同)。而在特殊的情況下,球的半徑為1,則球面三角形的面積A = E。

    要解球面幾何的問題,要點是能剖析出其中的直角三角形(三個角中有一個是90°),因為這樣就可以利用納皮爾的多邊形求解。


    納皮爾的圓周顯示直角三角形的部份關聯性利用納皮爾多邊形(也稱為納皮爾圓周)的口訣可以很輕易的記住球面直角三角形的所有關聯性: 以他們出現於球面三角形的順序,依照相鄰的邊角關係,依序將三角形的六個角寫在一個圈子內,也就是開始以一個角度開始,然後在它旁邊寫上相鄰的邊的弧角度,繼續再寫下下一個角度,˙˙˙,最後結束成一個圓。然後刪除90°的角角度並且將它相鄰的弧角度替換成他們補角的數值(與原角弧度之和為90°) (也就是將 a 換成 90° − a)。 現在,這五個數組成了我們需要的納皮爾多邊形(納皮爾圓周),從這兒,可以得到每個角度的餘弦值等於:

    相鄰兩角度的餘切的乘積
    相對兩角度的正弦的乘積
    可以參考半正矢(Haversine formula),能在球面三角上解析弧長與角度,為航海學提供了穩定的模式。

    [編輯] 恆等式
    球面三角形滿足球面餘弦定理


    這個恆等式的証明需要利用平面的餘弦定理和球面三角形的對角"C"延升的切線。

    他也滿足並且有正弦定理
  • 訪客
  • 萬一「地球自轉速度、地軸延長線和近日點遠日點的相對位置、赤道黃道白道的夾角、月球軌道、地球公轉軌道」﹙問題由小而大排列﹚因x星大接近而改變,就得自己用日月星來定出自己所在的『緯』度,才能決定下一步要多快向新赤道方向移動。
    惡補一下球面幾何與天文航海。南半球的星空去請教天文台。
    這也是求生工具之一。
  • 訪客
  • 推薦野外求生秘笈,金石堂剛上架,特價499

    沒封膜,可以掀翻翻看

    驚嚇指數及實用指數都破五顆星

    有教在野外如何就地取材搭避難所
    連南極都教你如何挖雪屋~~有沒有很貼心

    還示範如何抓魚,生吃活魚~~那張照片真的嚇到我了
    當然抓昆蟲教學是一定要的

    必備,強烈推薦

    對了,也教你看星星月亮~~
  • 訪客
  • to#88
    什麼是軸極?
    如果是印度配智利外海,台灣的緯度也是78度左右嗎?


    是不是不管極移後 板塊移位也好 新南北極是巴西 印度 智利外海或 夏威夷....
    台灣就是逃不過極地氣候 (若只是高緯度還較好生活)
    台灣四面都是海 來得及在變成冰天雪地時遷移
    還可搭船 但那兒有船 (飛機應該是不用想了吧)
    如果來不及 要怎麼萬里長征到溫暖的地方呢
    想到這 就頭皮發麻

    大家給點意見吧

    天佑台灣啊!
  • 訪客
  • 自轉軸與地表的交會點
  • Dr.City Stanley
  • to #94 書名應為 荒野求生秘技。^^
  • 訪客
  • 天文台有南半球的星空 很專業
    先把一等星或更亮的星背起來
    不多
    北半球才二十多
    南半球也要背


    這可以定方位 
  • william佛和
  • 給99樓
    非常好的影片分享
    和不可說的秘密談到的心靈不謀而合
    彼此加油彼此共勉
1 2

You haven’t logged in yet, please use guest status to leave message. You can also log in with above service account and leave message

other options